Monday, June 30, 2008

Movie Recommendation of the Year (So Far, Or At Least Until July 18th)


I'm pretty much in awe of Pixar at this point. Forget the commercial success of their films. In the last decade plus, they've turned out a level of quality cinema that rivals the output of any studio you could mention. They're so far beyond their competitors that it's no longer a competition. I'm speaking not only in terms of story quality but somehow technology as well. Wall-E is the best looking computer-animated film I've ever seen.

A lot of critics have talked about the brilliance of the film's opening act, but this makes it seem as if the movie falls off in the latter parts. It doesn't. Not one iota. Andrew Stanton, the film's writer/director, doesn't sacrifice the poignancy of the early scenes with the ending's unbridled optimism. It felt like a natural conclusion to me. Stanton knows how to craft a tale. He showed that with Finding Nemo and cements it with Wall-E.

Everyone at Pixar knows the key to a great story and that's character development. Every film they make is character driven. Compare this to Dreamworks' most successful franchise: Shrek. The initial Shrek was a character driven story and by far the best of the series. After Shrek, the series devolved into a loose collection of pop culture references and sight gags held together by an extremely thin story. There was no growth of the core characters from one movie to the next. The creators way of expanding the story was to literally add more stock characters. And the result has been an unmemorable (and depressingly high-grossing) series of disposable celluloid candy.

Wall-E is equal parts love story and environmental cautionary tale. Stanton never lets either aspect overpower the other and that keeps the film from being too sentimental or pedantic. The social satire is fairly barbed for a kids' movie, but I loved it for being somewhat daring in that respect. It accomplishes what I think Mike Judge was trying to do with his little-seen film, Idiocracy, a film that had similar ideas and roughly the same message, but went about delivering it in a much more blunt (and subsequently less funny) manner.

Wall-E is the best film released theatrically so far this year. It's also one of the best things Pixar has ever done. I still give Ratatouille the slight edge in that respect. I'm admittedly biased towards Brad Bird, but considering the difficulty of turning a movie that deals with the intricacies of running a restaurant's kitchen into something entertaining to an audience, let alone a predominately child audience, I have to give his project a slightly higher props. Still, Andrew Stanton and his team have crafted a work worthy of Disney or Miyazaki. I can't pay a higher compliment.

P.S.: Sure we could argue about the irony of a movie with a strong environmental/anti-consumerism message being distributed by a company that has reaped tens of billions off of Happy Meal tie-ins and will undoubtedly reap more from sundry promotional knickknacks related to this film, but that'd be no fun.

Wednesday, June 18, 2008

Finals Post-Mortem



  • The '07-'08 Lakers are the worst team to make the Finals since, well, the '06-'07 Cavaliers. The only difference is that it took the Finals to expose the Lakers while everybody knew last year that Cleveland was a joke from the outset.


  • Pau Gasol makes Dirk Nowitzki look like Charles Oakley.


  • Lamar Odom spent four of six games doing a Carmen Sandiego impression. For chrissakes man, you're the third option! You've got no pressure. Take a deep breath and just play next time.


  • The Lakers' defining image of this year's Finals should be Sasha Vujacic petulantly swatting away the hand of someone trying to pat him on the back as the Celts were unraveling the Lakers thread by thread in game 4.


  • The '07-'08 Celtics are the first (and I don't mean this in a bad way) mercenary team to make the "Big Three" formula work. Remember the '96-'97 Rockets? '03-'04 Lakers?


  • Boston's Big Three wouldn't seem to have enough collective ego to fill a Gatorade bottle. How can you hate these guys? How can you even mildly dislike them? And this is coming from a lifelong Pistons fan.


  • Rajon Rondo shook off his rep and made himself a legit NBA starting point. Yeah, he still makes indefensible decisions, but once he develops a consistent shot to go along with his speed and harassing defense, he'll be a force. Remember a few years ago, people were talking about trading Tony Parker. Takes a few years for most players to fully develop as NBA PGs.


  • In a perfect world, the first two rounds of the playoffs would be best-of-five and there would never be more than a two-day layoff between games (and that would only be to travel between coasts). Since that won't happen, I'll settle for the games starting at 8:00 EST. I guarantee the only people who saw the end of game 6 were Bostonians and sports writers. Stern, you're killing the league chasing a few extra advertising dollars. C'mon, I'll even take 8:30!


  • In DC comics, they had this thing called Crisis on Infinite Earths years and years ago. One of the outcomes was a re-written history of Superman. The pre-Crisis Superman could do stuff like balance the Earth on his pinky finger while drinking a fifth of vodka. Post-Crisis Superman, while still the strongest character in the DC universe was considerably less 'super.' (He was able to be killed after all.) In my geek-oriented mind, this is the perfect analogy for Jordan and Kobe. Jordan did things (the flu-game for example) that nobody should be able to do. You never doubted for a second after the '91 Finals that a Jordan-led team would go anything less than the distance. He could have won 10 titles if he so chose. Despite his inexplicable performance in this year's Finals, I still think Kobe is the best player in the NBA. Nonetheless, he'll be spending the next couple of years trying to rehabilitate his on-court image. Who'd have thought that considering the NBA's spin masters' Herculean attempt to transform The Mamba into the NBA's greatest teammate and family man? There is a contemporary athlete who compares favorably to Jordan; he just happens to play golf and not roundball.


  • Seriously, I'm expecting Kobe to hold another press conference. Teary-eyed, he'd explain his execrable Finals performance while a stone-faced, steely-eyed Jack Nicholson icily sat next to him.


  • Also in my dreamworld, Barkley and Bill Walton would do the color-commentary for the Finals. Throw Magic in there just for extra comedic effect.